Disclaimer: New EUDR developments - December 2025
In November 2025, the European Parliament and Council backed key changes to the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), including a 12‑month enforcement delay and simplified obligations based on company size and supply chain role.
Key changes proposed:
These updates are not yet legally binding. A final text will be confirmed through trilogue negotiations and formal publication in the EU’s Official Journal. Until then, the current EUDR regulation and deadlines remain in force.
We continue to monitor developments and will update all guidance as the final law is adopted.
Latest update: February 25, 2026
The EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) timeline has now been officially revised. On 17 November 2025, the Council adopted its official position proposing a full one‑year delay for large and medium operators to 30 December 2026, and a further extension for small and micro primary operators to 30 June 2027 (non-timber). Following the European Parliament's vote on 26 November 2025 to support a full one-year delay, trilogue negotiations between the Parliament, Council, and Commission concluded swiftly.
Read our in depth summary of the Parliament vote here.
The new legally binding enforcement dates are:
The revision also mandates a formal simplification review by the European Commission by 30 April 2026, which may result in further legislative changes. Read our in-depth summary of the Parliament vote here.
What happens next?:
In this article, we explain what’s changed, what remains the same, and what compliance teams should do in 2026.
The new legally binding enforcement dates are:
The European Council published its official position on this and this move was later accepted in the Parliament's vote on 26 November.
Below is an overview of the European Parliament’s position on the EUDR timeline:

Coolset has summarised the Parliament vote in this article.
The EUDR timeline has shifted several times. Originally set for December 2024, enforcement was delayed to December 2025. In late 2025, the Commission proposed a grace period, but the Council instead backed a full one-year delay. On 26 November, the Parliament supported this approach, and on 23 December this approach was confirmed and published in the Official EU Journal.
Here’s the detailed timeline of EUDR changes, accepted and proposed delays:
The EUDR was officially delayed following the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2025/2650, published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 23 December 2025.
A majority in the European Parliament voted to support the Council’s proposed one-year delay to the EUDR:
What happens next: Parliament will submit its position as a first reading, and trilogue negotiations with the Council and Commission will begin.
The Council has proposed:
Read the Council's full summary here.
In a shift from the tone from Commissioner Roswall’s letter (see below), which proposed one-year delay in EUDR enforcement, The European Commission's proposal maintained the original December 2025 deadline for most large and medium-sized operators, suggesting to:
Following Commissioner Roswall's letter, EU debate intensified. Several Member States backed a delay, citing competitiveness and administrative burden. The European People’s Party supported postponement as a way to correct regulatory flaws and protect SMEs. In contrast, the Socialists & Democrats criticized the move, calling the delay a concession to lobbying pressure that risks weakening enforcement. Meanwhile, in a separate letter from major companies including Nestlé, Mars Wrigley and Ferrero, they urged the European Commission not to delay the EUDR and reaffirmed their commitment to the December 2025 deadline.
In a letter to the European Parliament and the Council, Commissioner Jessika Roswall recommended postponing EUDR enforcement until December 2026. The proposal cited delays in the EU’s TRACES IT system and uneven readiness across Member States as key reasons for deferring the enforcement timeline.The letter was non-binding and intended to ease growing political pressure around the regulation’s rollout.
In 2024, the enforcement timeline for the EUDR was moved from December 2024 to December 2025, citing system and enforcement readiness concerns.
{{custom-cta}}
The EUDR timeline has now been officially revised. Following trilogue negotiations, a political agreement was reached on 4 December 2025. The European Parliament formally adopted the text on 17 December and this was formally endorsed by the European Council on 18 December. Regulation (EU) 2025/2650 was published in the Official Journal of the EU on 23 December 2025 and entered into force on 26 December 2025, just days before the original December 2025 deadline would have applied.
The European Commission's October proposal introduced new role categories, which were expanded in the Council’s position and these have now been endorsed by the European Parliament.
1. Large and medium operators: Deadline delayed, core obligations unchanged
Operators with >50 employees and ≥€10 million turnover must still collect supplier data, conduct risk assessments, and submit due diligence statements (DDS) in TRACES. The new proposed enforcement date is 30 December 2026, with no grace period. Full due diligence applies regardless of country risk level.
2. Small and micro primary operators: New simplified declaration
Small and micro primary operators in low-risk countries who place products on the market themselves will not submit full DDS. Instead, they will file a one-time simplified declaration, which must be updated only in case of major changes. They can use postal addresses instead of geolocation. The new enforcement date is 30 June 2027.
3. Downstream operators: Scope narrowed, obligations simplified
Downstream operators are now clearly defined as businesses that buy from operators and place those products on the market.
4. Non-SME traders: Follow simplified downstream rules
Larger traders (non-SMEs) who do not directly import products no longer need to submit DDS. They must follow the same obligations as downstream operators: retain and pass on DDS reference numbers, without having to create or validate new DDS.
5. SME traders: Minimal burden maintained
Small and medium-sized traders continue to collect and retain DDS references but are not required to submit them. No new obligations apply.
For a practical breakdown of the latest roles and responsibilities, check this overview.
Large and medium operators are defined as companies above small and medium enterprise (SME) thresholds (typically >50 employees and >€10 million turnover) that place materials on the EU market, either through production or import, or export materials from the EU.
Example: A global cocoa importer sourcing from Côte d’Ivoire must geolocate farm plots, assess deforestation risk, and submit a DDS for every shipment placed on the EU market.
Small and micro primary operators are small producers or farmers who grow, harvest, or raise relevant products themselves and are established in low-risk countries as defined under the EU benchmarking system.
Following the Parliament’s recent vote, small and micro primary operators would no longer need to submit a full DDS. Instead, they would provide a one-time simplified declaration to be updated only if major changes occur, but this will only apply if adopted in the final legal text.
Example: A smallholder in Germany harvesting timber submits a simplified declaration once. That declaration applies to all future shipments unless their production circumstances significantly change.
Downstream operators are any natural or legal person who, in the course of a commercial activity, places on the EU market or exports relevant products to the EU that are already covered by a due diligence statement or a simplified declaration. They may place these products on the EU market, but they are not the ones conducting new due diligence because all inputs have already been verified upstream.
The Parliament’s vote adopted the following conditions:
Example: A chocolate manufacturer sourcing cocoa directly from an operator must retain and transmit DDS references. If sourcing from a downstream trader, the manufacturer is no longer in scope.

To be ready ahead of enforcement, companies typically begin by mapping supply chains, collecting supplier data, assessing risks, and building TRACES-compatible due diligence workflows.
6-step readiness playbook:
Clients use Coolset to centralize supplier data, manage version control, and automatically generate audit-ready due diligence statements (DDS) in TRACES-compatible formats.
{{product-tour-injectable}}
All countries are currently classified as standard risk under the EUDR. The European Parliament rejected the Commission’s proposed benchmarking act, meaning no country currently benefits from any ‘low-risk’ shortcuts. As a result, all due diligence obligations apply equally, including geolocation, legality documentation, and risk assessments.
Core obligations now apply from 30 December 2026 for large and medium operators, and from 30 June 2027 for small and micro primary operators (non-timber products). The regulation also requires the Commission to conduct a formal review of the administrative burden by 30 April 2026, which may result in a further legislative proposal.
Companies should continue building due diligence workflows, collecting supplier data, and testing TRACES compatibility.
Yes. The EUDR has been officially delayed following the adoption of the Amended EUDR published in the Official Journal of the EU on 23 December 2025. The new legally binding enforcement dates are 30 December 2026 for large and medium operators, and 30 June 2027 for small and micro operators (non-timber products). The European Commission is also required to conduct a simplification review and deliver a report by 30 April 2026
No, the grace period (Jan-June 2026) was part of the Commission’s October proposal. The Council and Parliament have replaced this with a full enforcement delay.
Yes. Small and micro operators have an extended deadline of 30 June 2027 for non-timber products, six months after the 30 December 2026 date that applies to large and medium operators. Small and micro primary operators are also only required to submit a one-time simplified declaration, which needs updating only if major changes occur. The regulation additionally mandates a formal simplification review by the Commission by 30 April 2026, which may result in further legislative changes.
No. All imports are currently subject to standard risk under the EUDR. The EU Parliament rejected the Commission’s proposed benchmarking system, so no country currently benefits from a low-risk designation.
Our research team walks you through every step - from supplier engagement to submitting in TRACES.

This free compliance checker scans your packaging documentation and maps it against mandatory PPWR data requirements, giving you a clear view of your compliance status. Get actionable insights on documentation gaps before they become compliance issues.
Get your systems ready for traceability, risk assessment and due diligence.

Based on customer case studies our team has developed a realistic timeline and planning for EUDR compliance. Access it here.