Disclaimer: New EUDR developments - December 2025
In November 2025, the European Parliament and Council backed key changes to the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), including a 12‑month enforcement delay and simplified obligations based on company size and supply chain role.
Key changes proposed:
These updates are not yet legally binding. A final text will be confirmed through trilogue negotiations and formal publication in the EU’s Official Journal. Until then, the current EUDR regulation and deadlines remain in force.
We continue to monitor developments and will update all guidance as the final law is adopted.
Disclaimer: 2026 Omnibus changes to CSRD and ESRS
In December 2025, the European Parliament approved the Omnibus I package, introducing changes to CSRD scope, timelines and related reporting requirements.
As a result, parts of this article may no longer fully reflect the latest regulatory position. We are currently reviewing and updating our CSRD and ESRS content to align with the new rules.
Key changes include:
We continue to monitor regulatory developments closely and will update this article as further guidance and implementation details are confirmed.
ESRS S1 (Own workforce) sets the reporting requirements for how a company manages impacts, risks and opportunities related to employees and certain non-employee workers in its own workforce.
The original European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) were adopted by the European Commission in July 2023. They are the standards used by companies in scope of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) to structure sustainability reporting and to define what to disclose on environmental, social and governance topics. After the Omnibus Proposal was published on February 26, 2025, EFRAG was tasked with simplifying the ESRS, resulting in a new draft version published in November 2025. All in all, 61% of original datapoints have been removed in the new version.
So what exactly is the new ESRS S1 and why is it essential? What are its primary requirements? And how can you effectively implement the datapoints? The article will give you a comprehensive understanding of the updated standard.
ESRS S1 is one of the four social standards. It focuses on the company’s impacts on its own workforce, including working conditions, social dialogue, health and safety, training, diversity and equal treatment and other labor-related human rights.
ESRS S1 only applies if Own workforce is material, but some workforce data points still become mandatory once the topic is material.
Under CSRD, companies do not report every topic in every ESRS by default. A double materiality assessment determines whether own workforce is material and which sub-topics within ESRS S1 are material for reporting.
Two practical implications matter:
In the November 2025 ESRS S1 draft, EFRAG also makes explicit that once own workforce is material, the disclosure on employee characteristics is required (S1-5). Disclosure on non-employees is required if non-employees are connected to material impacts, risks or opportunities (S1-6).
The following table lays out the structure of the ESRS:

The November 2025 draft tightens definitions and shifts ESRS S1 toward fewer, clearer data points that are easier to verify and compare.
If the draft direction sticks (which we think it will), the biggest practical changes for reporting teams are:
Important: this is a draft. Companies should track the final ESRS text, but the direction is already useful for building data collection processes that will survive scrutiny.
ESRS S1 expects a company to explain how it governs own workforce impacts, risks and opportunities through policies, engagement, remediation and actions.
Companies must describe policies used to manage material impacts, risks and opportunities related to own workforce and whether policies cover the whole workforce or specific groups. The draft also explicitly asks whether policies address trafficking in human beings, forced labor and child labor.
What to include in practice:
Companies must explain how they engage with employees or worker representatives, how workforce perspectives inform decisions and which channels exist for workers to raise concerns and obtain remedy.
New or clearer draft expectations to call out:
Companies must describe key actions and resources used to manage material impacts, risks and opportunities and how effectiveness is tracked.
The draft adds useful specificity:
{{custom-cta}}
Companies must disclose qualitative and/or quantitative targets related to own workforce under the ESRS 2 target framing.
In practice, targets work best when they are:
Companies must disclose core employee workforce numbers and turnover, plus explain methodology choices if needed.
New or updated data points to make explicit:
Practical note for EU companies with multiple countries: use national legal definitions for permanent, temporary and non-guaranteed hours at country level, then add up totals.
Companies must disclose the total number of non-employees in the own workforce if non-employees are connected to material impacts, risks or opportunities.
The draft frames when this becomes relevant:
The total number can be headcount or FTE, reported at end-of-year or as an average, but the company must state which option it used.
Companies must report collective bargaining coverage and, in EEA countries with significant employment, social dialogue coverage via worker representatives.
New or clearer breakdown requirements:
Companies must disclose gender distribution at the top management level, both as headcount and percentage.
The draft defines “top management” as the two levels below administrative and supervisory bodies, unless a company uses a different definition and discloses it.
Companies must disclose whether employees are paid an adequate wage and which benchmark is used, with country-level context. If not all employees are paid an adequate wage, companies must name the countries and the percentage of employees concerned.
New or clearer draft mechanics:
What to write in the article section so it stays actionable:
Companies must disclose countries where employees lack social protection for major life events, if gaps exist.
The draft is explicit about which events matter:
This is an “exceptions” disclosure. If all employees are covered, a company can usually say so with brief context on coverage sources (public schemes, company benefits, collective bargaining).
Companies must disclose the percentage of employees with disabilities, subject to legal restrictions on data collection.
The draft also expects methodological transparency:
Companies must disclose two core metrics for the reporting period.
New or updated data points:
The draft clarifies that a formalized review is based on criteria known to the employee and undertaken at least once per year.
Companies must disclose coverage of the occupational safety and health (OSH) management system and a structured set of incident metrics.
New or clearer draft data points to make explicit:
If non-employees are material under S1-6, the company must include non-employee cases in fatalities from accidents and accident cases and break down between employees and non-employees where applicable.
Companies must disclose the percentage of employees entitled to family-related leave during the reporting period.
Family-related leave includes:
The focus is entitlement, not uptake.
Companies must disclose:
The draft is unusually specific about inclusions:
Companies must disclose three things for the reporting period:
The draft clarifies that incidents are substantiated instances such as judicial or non-judicial proceedings initiated or incidents registered by the company through internal processes.
A good ESRS S1 approach starts with a clear materiality decision, then builds a data model that matches the disclosure requirements instead of collecting everything “just in case.”
Companies are not required to report on all 37 sub-topics described in the topical ESRS, only those that are material to their business. Conducting a double materiality assessment helps identify and prioritize the most significant ESG matters to report on.
This process should consider both impact materiality and financial materiality when identifying material matters.
Examples
Enel has included ‘Own workforce’ as a material issue in their sustainability report. Their focus is on ensuring a safe, inclusive, and empowering work environment, which they see as directly tied to their overall business performance and sustainability goals. They list the ‘health and safety of employees’ and ‘quality of corporate life’ as key components of their material topics.
Nestlé has recognized ‘Own workforce’ as material in their CSRD-aligned reporting. Their focus on employee rights, diversity, inclusion, and working conditions is central to their approach to sustainability, particularly given the extensive workforce required in their global operations.
Below each ESRS sit sub-topics, which inform the areas that the materiality assessment should cover. The amount of sub-topics vary depending on the ESRS, but there are generally between 3 and 5. When conducting a materiality assessment for ESRS S1, consider the following subtopics:
Evaluates the quality of the working environment provided by the company, including health and safety measures, work-life balance, fair remuneration, and access to social security benefits. This ensures the company fosters a safe, healthy, and supportive workplace for all employees.
Focuses on the company’s commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). This includes measures to address pay gaps, prevent discrimination, support employees with disabilities, and ensure equal opportunities regardless of gender, race, or other personal characteristics. This helps identify areas for improving DEI practices.
Assesses the company’s policies and practices related to broader work-related rights, such as freedom of association, collective bargaining, and privacy at work. It also includes how the company handles grievances and complaints related to these rights, ensuring these rights are respected is crucial for maintaining a fair and just workplace.
ESRS S1 requires businesses to provide a detailed account of their workforce management plan, which is a corporate action plan to ensure fair and sustainable labor practices.
Key elements of a workforce management plan include:
Detail the specific steps your business will take to enhance workforce management, including:
Your action plan should include specific, measurable goals for improving workforce development and well-being. Set ambitious yet achievable targets to ensure continuous improvement.
Monitor and report on key workforce metrics for transparency and to identify areas for improvement. Track metrics such as employee turnover, health and safety incidents, and training participation rates.
Under ESRS S1, businesses must disclose their workforce policies and practices in detail. Report on health and safety measures, diversity and inclusion initiatives, and employee development programs.
For businesses reporting on CSRD, managing workforce topics under ESRS S1 can be daunting and time-consuming, especially when data sits across HR, finance and H&S systems. The right tools can make a significant difference. Workforce reporting software can simplify the process, streamline data collection and analysis, provide actionable insights and generate reports automatically, accelerating your compliance journey.
Discover how workforce reporting software can fast-track your CSRD compliance by requesting a free demo today.
ESRS S1 covers employees and certain non-employees in the company’s own workforce, such as self-employed people supplying labor or workers provided by employment agencies. ESRS S1 does not cover upstream or downstream value chain workers, those are covered under ESRS S2.
The draft explicitly requires headcount by gender and by key countries, contract type breakdowns, employee turnover and a description of the methodology used to compile employee data (end-of-year vs average).
The draft defines employee turnover as the number of employees who leave voluntarily or due to dismissal, retirement or death in service divided by the average employee headcount.
The draft asks whether employees are paid an adequate wage and which benchmark is used, with country-level context. The benchmark cannot be lower than applicable minimum wage levels in the EU or credible living wage or adequate minimum wage references outside the EU.
If gaps exist, companies must name countries where employees lack social protection for sickness, unemployment, employment injury and acquired disability or maternity leave.
The draft requires an unadjusted gender pay gap and the ratio of the highest-paid individual’s annual total remuneration to median annual total remuneration for employees (excluding the highest-paid individual), with clear rules on what pay components to include.
Streamline data collection and reporting across the Double Materialty Assessment and ESRS topic disclosures.

Streamline data collection and reporting across the Double Materiality Assessment and ESRS topic disclosures.
