Every business leaves a footprint. Some know how big theirs is, while others find out the hard way. In 2024, 43% of European mid-market companies reported significant investment in decarbonization, with more than half already treating it as a way to cut costs and win market share.
But compliance is just as pressing. With new EU rules like the CSRD, CBAM, and EUDR coming into force, companies are under growing pressure to back up sustainability claims with verified carbon data, or risk fines, supply chain disruption, and even being cut out of key markets.
And the pressure isn’t only from regulators: 84% of consumers say they’ll walk away from brands with poor environmental practices. Measuring your footprint is quickly becoming the baseline for staying competitive in Europe.
So where do you start? This guide breaks down how to measure your company’s carbon footprint step by step, covering Scopes 1, 2, and 3 emissions. We’ll walk through the basics of the GHG Protocol and ESRS E1, what data you’ll need to collect, and some practical examples to help you build a footprint that’s audit-ready and useful for your business.
Measuring a carbon footprint means calculating all the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions linked to your business, both from your own operations and across your wider value chain.
To make results consistent and comparable, companies typically follow the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard, which is also the basis for the EU’s new ESRS E1 climate disclosure rules.
Emissions are grouped into three categories, known as scopes:
Why does this matter? A complete footprint is the foundation for compliance and action. Under the EU’s CSRD, companies need audited emissions data across all three scopes.
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) also requires a baseline footprint before setting net-zero targets. And beyond compliance, the numbers are what allow you to spot emission hotspots, prioritize reductions, and track progress over time.
{{custom-cta}}
Before calculating emissions, companies need to set clear boundaries. The GHG Protocol Corporate Standard requires organizations to decide on four key elements:
It’s now also best practice to ensure alignment with ESRS E1 (for CSRD compliance in the EU) and the SBTi, so the data you collect can be used for both regulatory reporting and target-setting.
Our guide on creating your first carbon reduction plan in 5 steps explains how to turn a baseline footprint into meaningful targets and reduction strategies.
Scope 1 emissions cover direct emissions from sources you own or control (e.g., boilers, on-site generators, company vehicles) plus fugitive releases (e.g., refrigerant leaks).
Stationary combustion (natural gas, fuel oil), mobile combustion (company cars, vans, plant), process emissions, and refrigerants (HVAC, refrigeration).
Use the best available, current factors that include CO₂, CH₄ and N₂O: supplier-specific if you have them; otherwise national/authoritative libraries (e.g., UK Government GHG Conversion Factors, IEA, EPA/EEA). For refrigerants, convert kg × GWP100 to CO₂e (use the GWP set required by your reporting framework).
For combustion:
For refrigerants:
Record data sources, factor sources and vintage (year), unit conversions, and any assumptions. Keep meter/bill extracts and maintenance logs.
Scope 2 emissions cover indirect emissions from purchased energy: mainly electricity, steam, heating, and cooling consumed by your operations. Under the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance, companies must report emissions using two methods:
To measure Scope 2 step by step:
For companies just starting out, location-based data gives a reliable baseline, while market-based reporting helps demonstrate the impact of renewable energy purchasing. You can learn more about practical measurement approaches in our guide on how to measure carbon emissions for business.
Scope 3 emissions are all the indirect emissions that occur across a company’s value chain. The GHG Protocol breaks these down into 15 categories, ranging from purchased goods and services to business travel, logistics, investments, and waste disposal (see Figure 1 above).
For most organizations, these emissions are by far the largest part of the footprint. In fact, McKinsey estimates they usually account for around 90% of total emissions.
The process is where most of the effort in a Scope 3 assessment lies. According to the GHG Protocol, it typically unfolds in four steps:
Review all 15 Scope 3 categories and identify which are relevant to your business. Materiality depends on industry, operating model, and reporting goals. For example, manufacturers often focus on purchased goods, logistics, and end-of-life, while financial institutions focus on financed emissions.
Conduct a high-level screening using less specific data, such as spend-based economic input–output (EEIO) factors. This helps locate “hot spots” and size emissions across categories. The aim is not precision but direction: which categories are likely the biggest contributors, pose risks, or matter most to stakeholders .
For priority categories, replace generic estimates with primary data. This involves:
Supplier engagement is often the most resource-intensive step, but also the most valuable.
Focus on the largest and most material categories first. Over time, refine coverage and data quality by applying more accurate methods to big emitters, high-risk activities, or stakeholder-sensitive areas. The process is iterative: companies typically start with lower-quality data and improve as suppliers and systems mature.
Our guide on the 4 biggest challenges when measuring Scope 3 emissions outlines common pitfalls, and we explain why your biggest customers now expect you to report Scope 3 emissions if you want to understand the growing business case.
Carbon accounting is only as strong as the data behind it. To ensure your footprint is reliable and audit-ready, companies should check three things:
For a deeper dive into preparing datasets that auditors will accept, see our guide on preparing your financial data for carbon accounting.
Measuring emissions is only the starting point. Once you have a complete inventory, it becomes the baseline for setting targets and tracking progress:
For more on the shift from measurement to action, see our guide on spending more time on carbon reduction (and less on data hassles), and explore nine practical decarbonisation methods to reduce supply chain emissions.
For many companies, manual data collection and spreadsheets quickly become unmanageable, especially once Scope 3 categories and supplier data are involved.
Platforms like Coolset streamline the process by combining:
Request a free demo to see how Coolset can streamline your carbon footprint measurement today.
Scope 1 covers direct emissions from sources a company owns or controls, such as fuel burned in vehicles or boilers. Scope 2 refers to indirect emissions from purchased energy like electricity, steam, heating, or cooling.
Scope 3 includes all other indirect emissions across the value chain, from purchased goods and logistics to employee commuting and end-of-life treatment of products.
The GHG Protocol Corporate Standard is the global benchmark for defining and calculating emissions. In Europe, companies in scope of the CSRD must also align with ESRS E1, while those setting net-zero or near-term goals often use the SBTi for credibility. Following these frameworks ensures consistency, comparability, and compliance.
Smaller businesses can begin with simple approaches, such as using activity data (e.g. fuel use or electricity bills) for Scope 1 and 2, and spend-based estimates for Scope 3. This creates an initial footprint that can be improved over time as more accurate data becomes available. Starting small is better than delaying until perfect data is in place.
At a minimum, companies should recalculate their footprint annually to track year-on-year progress. A recalculation is also needed whenever significant organisational changes occur, such as acquisitions, divestitures, or major shifts in operations. This ensures the baseline remains accurate and comparable.
Supplier-specific data is critical for improving the accuracy of Scope 3 reporting, especially in categories like purchased goods and logistics where generic factors can give distorted results.
Engaging suppliers directly allows companies to move beyond estimates and capture the real impact of their supply chain. Over time, this collaboration helps reduce emissions across the value chain.
Sustainability reporting 2.0: Market forces, ESG risks and the next five years
Updated on March 24, 2025 - This article reflects the latest EU Omnibus regulatory changes and is accurate as of March 24, 2025. Its content has been reviewed to provide the most up-to-date guidance on ESG reporting in Europe.
Updated on July 25, 2025 - This article references a previous version of the EUDR country risk benchmarking system. On July 9, the European Parliament rejected the proposed classification. We are actively monitoring the latest developments. For the most up-to-date guidance, read our updated article on the EUDR benchmarking vote. In the meantime, assume full due diligence applies across all regions.
Ask our sustainability experts how to integrate your financial data in our platform today.