With exclusive insights from 250+ companies, we break down how businesses are responding to the Omnibus Proposal, the growing role of voluntary reporting, and what it all means for your ESG strategy.
Stakeholder interviews have become an essential tool for companies to improve their sustainability reporting by integrating insights from the actors that are directly affected by or who can influence the company’s activities at different stages. Hence, it’s a critical aspect for a company’s compliance to EU regulations and standards such as the CSRD and the ESRS.
Incorporating these inputs into practice, particularly in the context of double materiality assessments (DMA), helps companies both foresee and manage upcoming material impacts, risks and opportunities. Moreover, it captures the needs, interests, and expectations of stakeholders, building future-proof businesses for long-term value creation and resilience.
This article addresses the best practices linked to incorporating stakeholder insights into double materiality assessments to achieve comprehensive sustainability reporting and compliance. We’ll provide a step-by-step guide on how to identify different types of stakeholders and engage them through stakeholder interviews.
The European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) lays down what it means to engage stakeholders, and how to do so. Older frameworks like NFRD focused primarily on environmental or financial disclosures in isolation. This has changed. Now, stakeholder interviews constitute a crucial part of DMAs. Although indirectly related, they contribute to dialogue between companies and stakeholders. This is exactly what is needed to achieve the comprehensive approach behind ESRS. Without these inputs, sustainability assessments are incomplete.
This is how stakeholders engagement is an essential pillar to meet with sustainability reporting standards:
Knowledge on the disclosure requirements highlighted above allow you to effectively engage with your stakeholders for the future interviewing process. These are the 5 levels to follow:
Level 1: Inform your stakeholders
Letting the relevant stakeholders know an input will be required beforehand improves transparency and enables trust within the organization. This foundation is crucial for DMAs and CSRD processes.
In relation to ESRS 2, SBM-2, this involves disclosing:
You can inform your stakeholders about these by sending an email or setting up a meeting.
Level 2: Consult your stakeholders
Once stakeholders are well informed of the activities and projects the company is involved in, consulting is the next sensible step to take. Sustainability managers can reach out to their stakeholders to actively seek inputs. In the context of DMA, the consultation process often involves interviews where stakeholders might share their perspectives on sustainability impacts and risks. These interviews allow for legal compliance under IRO-1, ensuring that DMAs are informed by real stakeholder concerns.
After gathering information from stakeholders, the company might have found that some of the input should be integrated. This is where communication turns two-way. The involvement stage gives stakeholders proactive engagement and the ability to shape the projects that the company is involved in.Interviews and surveys are go-to methods at this stage as well.
Level 4: Collaborate with your stakeholders
Taking it a step further, stakeholder involvement in the projects eventually translates into meaningful collaboration. Decision-making processes take part of this stage, and stakeholders are considered as an integral pillar of the company.
Empowering stakeholders constitutes the final step of their engagement. It materializes into stakeholder-led outcomes. At this stage, stakeholders have achieved the highest degree of authority, dialogue, and proactiveness within the company and its projects. Empowerment allows for a holistic approach to double materiality assessment and ESG integration in CSRD projects.
The stakeholder pool for your company might be too broad; you just do not know where to start. In that case, the best path to follow is the creation of stakeholder mappings. They will allow you to have an overview of your stakeholders, classify them, and understand how they best contribute to the purposes of your sustainability strategy and DMA processes.
Once different types of stakeholders have been identified, you have to prioritize them. The ideal way to do so is scoring them on a scale from 1 to 5, one being the lowest and five the highest, for each of a set of criteria. The overall score of each stakeholder is what matters, however, some exceptions can be made.
Influential stakeholders have the power to shape and control the company’s decision on specific matters. To evaluate the influence of your stakeholders, you can ask questions such as:
If the answer is no, they will score between 1 and 2 points on the scale
If positive, these stakeholders would most probably rank between 3 to 4 points
The more urgent the need to act the more influential your stakeholder is. They should account for high influence in your scoring (5 points)
In the context of sustainability, for instance, regulators are highly influential stakeholders (5 points) as they set the basis for sustainability legislation
Interest illustrates the level of concern of stakeholders in the company’s project. Assessing the interest of your stakeholders involve understanding these points:
If the answer for your stakeholder is no visible engagement, it will score between 1 and 2 points
If your stakeholder is only partially engaged, it should score (3 points)
The stakeholders who are the most affected are most probably actively interested and concerned by your sustainability practices, ranking the highest
NGOs are considered as highly interested stakeholders in the sustainability context (5 points)
Some stakeholders might have more expertise than others in DMA and CSRD projects. In CSRD and DMAs projects, the criteria of knowledge should prioritize highly knowledgeable stakeholders such as scientists or ESG experts. Consider analyzing the following:
If your stakeholders are not scientists or ESG experts, they will probably rank low according to this criterion
Moderately knowledgeable stakeholders should score between 2 and 3 points
Highest scores - between 4 and 5- allow you to identify the most knowledgeable stakeholders in your pool
Illustrates the development level of stakeholder groups in integrating ESG to their activities and objectives. As the combination between interest and knowledge, ESG maturity of stakeholders vary, and it is important to identify where they stand. To identify this criteria, it is usually helpful to look at their overall maturity as a group through the following questions:
The lack of reporting commitments place a stakeholder at a lower score, between 1 and 2 points
Moderate ESG targets and partnerships, and those on early stages, make stakeholders have an intermediate score (3 points)
Stakeholders with long-standing reporting frameworks will obtain the highest score
Stakeholder size is defined by looking at several factors, such as geographic scope or number of employees. In any case, bigger stakeholders usually translate into bigger participation, although it is not always the case.
Localized stakeholders might rank significantly lower than multi-scale stakeholders.
Institutional stakeholders, for example, could take an intermediate stance, between 2 and 3 points
International stakeholders are more likely to increase DMAS’s coverage (5 points)
As a reminder that there are exceptions in the stakeholder ranking based on these criteria, size is usually challenged by the type of relationship between the company and the stakeholders. Small stakeholders can make big contributions. To confirm or reject this, figure out the following:
Key customers and strategic partners are the most likely to rank high according to this criterion.
Your company is now ready to start with stakeholder interviews. Here is a timeline frame to help with the process:
Prepare in advance for your interviews with the selected stakeholders. This step is crucial because it would ensure the quality, effectiveness, and potential success of the interviews, and the translation of the obtained insights into your company’s Double Materiality Assessment.
Tip: To effectively prepare for the interview, define the interview goals, questions, and the team to conduct them.
Before starting the interview with your stakeholders, make sure to ask yourself these questions, and communicate them to the interviewees.
Communication is key. When reaching out, be clear about the purpose of the interviews, as well as the context of the project of CSRD and DMA. Stakeholders must know what it is required from them, so that they feel comfortable to share their insights. Transparency enhances trust and ensures active communication and genuine participation from stakeholders.
Tip: Sharing a timeline of the interview process is a valuable move to build this reliance. Think about setting and agenda to align expectations.
The next step is to purposely engage with your stakeholders. This is the stage where the actual interviews start taking place. At this level, the steps followed before start to gain meaning. Especially setting up a clear agenda and ensuring transparency and trust. To effectively engage with stakeholders, active listening is crucial to understand their workflow and processes, and how they affect your company’s operations and vice versa.
Tip: Use follow-up questions to develop the idea and paint a detailed picture. This will show your interviewees you are actively involved and listening, improving their engagement.
Now you are ready to start with the interview questions.
For Double Materiality Assessment, distinguishing between types of risk and types of impact is particularly relevant.
Impact questions include:
Risks questions include:
Staying connected with your network of stakeholders is pivotal for CSRD processes. Here is what your company should do to ensure ongoing engagement after stakeholder interviews:
Meeting compliance with certain minimum requirements is equally important to preparing the questions for stakeholder interviews. These steps include meeting with data protection regulations, terms and conditions, as well as retrieving personal data information.
Stakeholder personal data must be handled in accordance with GDPR.
To ensure appropriate use of privacy and confidentiality throughout the whole process, stakeholders must review and agree to terms and conditions.
To meet the requirements of follow up and feedback, essential for conducting effective stakeholder interviews and achieving engagement, gathering email addresses and contact details is key.
To efficiently engage with stakeholders through interviews, make sure you optimize the process so that the insights are captured accurately. Achieving this involves being able to translate stakeholder interviews into actionable outcomes. These are some common mistakes to avoid:
The diversity of your stakeholders pools is highly valuable for the broad nature of DMAs, where detail matters.
Stakeholder interviews are likely to be complex. To make sure all the information is stored , recording, transcribing and synthesizing the inputs is key. Using artificial intelligence can be helpful.
Interviews should be a genuine opportunity for dialogue and insight, not just a formality. Failing to provide stakeholders with open communication might negatively impact the interview’s outcome, and the general purpose of CSRD projects on DMA.
Stakeholder interviews have proven to be more than a compliance exercise. They are critical tools to navigate the complexities of Double Materiality Assessments and EU standards. When done right, stakeholder interviews unlock valuable insights for the company’s operations, allowing them to shape sustainability strategies and build long-standing stakeholder engagement.
If you want to find out how you can seamlessly engage your stakeholders, collect data and generate audit-ready reports all in one platform, reach out to our sustainability solutions team.
Note: This article is based on the original CSRD and ESRS. Following the release of the Omnibus proposal on February 26, some information may no longer be accurate. We are currently reviewing and updating this article to reflect the latest regulatory developments. In the meantime, we recommend reading our Omnibus deep-dive for up-to-date insights on reporting requirements.
Updated on March 24, 2025 - This article reflects the latest EU Omnibus regulatory changes and is accurate as of March 24, 2025. Its content has been reviewed to provide the most up-to-date guidance on ESG reporting in Europe.