Disclaimer: New EUDR developments - December 2025
In November 2025, the European Parliament and Council backed key changes to the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), including a 12‑month enforcement delay and simplified obligations based on company size and supply chain role.
Key changes proposed:
These updates are not yet legally binding. A final text will be confirmed through trilogue negotiations and formal publication in the EU’s Official Journal. Until then, the current EUDR regulation and deadlines remain in force.
We continue to monitor developments and will update all guidance as the final law is adopted.
Disclaimer: 2026 Omnibus changes to CSRD and ESRS
In December 2025, the European Parliament approved the Omnibus I package, introducing changes to CSRD scope, timelines and related reporting requirements.
As a result, parts of this article may no longer fully reflect the latest regulatory position. We are currently reviewing and updating our CSRD and ESRS content to align with the new rules.
Key changes include:
We continue to monitor regulatory developments closely and will update this article as further guidance and implementation details are confirmed.
The EU Omnibus Proposal has already reshaped the CSRD landscape in practice and more changes are coming. With the stop-the-clock delay now legally adopted, and the wider Omnibus I package moving through final publication and national implementation, many companies are reassessing what they need to do in 2026 and beyond.
The direction is clear: mandatory CSRD will apply to fewer companies, the timeline for Wave 2 has been pushed back, and the ESRS are being simplified, placing greater weight on materiality judgement and evidence quality.
To help you navigate these changes, we’ve compiled the most pressing questions companies are asking, from regulatory obligations and financial considerations to the future of ESG reporting.
Under the agreed Omnibus approach, CSRD scope is being narrowed significantly. The provisional agreement keeps companies in scope if they meet both:
This is a major shift away from the earlier “250 employees + financial thresholds” model many mid-market companies were preparing for.
Companies can report using either FTE (full-time equivalents) or total headcount, but they must disclose their chosen methodology. This is outlined in ESRS S1, paragraph 50b and 50d.
No, the threshold only includes direct employees. Contractors, freelancers, and temporary workers are not counted toward the 1,000-employee limit.
For EU-based companies, the 1,000-employee threshold includes global employees, meaning multinational firms must count their entire workforce.
No. Under the agreed approach, mandatory CSRD scope for EU undertakings requires both the employee threshold and the €450m net turnover threshold.
Crossing the CSRD size thresholds does not automatically trigger reporting the following year. In most cases, a company or group must meet the relevant criteria for two consecutive years before being considered in scope, with reporting starting according to the applicable CSRD phase-in timeline.
The stop-the-clock delay is already adopted, so Wave 2 timing is fixed at EU level. For the remaining Omnibus I changes companies remain subject to current national CSRD rules until updated national laws take effect following EU publication and transposition.
Companies that stop ESG reporting risk major financial and operational setbacks. Banks and investors increasingly offer lower interest rates and better financing terms to businesses with strong ESG performance. Large clients and supply chain partners often require ESG disclosures, meaning companies without them risk losing major contracts. Furthermore, ESG reporting helps businesses assess climate and social-related risks (such as supply chain disruptions due to extreme weather or changing labor regulations), allowing them to implement mitigation strategies.
{{custom-cta}}
VSME (Voluntary Sustainability Reporting Standard for SMEs) was developed at the request of the European Commission for non-listed micro, small and medium enterprises and falls outside the CSRD reporting regime. Developed by EFRAG, the same organization responsible for the ESRS (European Sustainability Reporting Standards), VSME aligns closely with ESRS while offering a simplified approach. Its purpose is to help SMEs enhance transparency and demonstrate sustainability commitments without the complexity and administrative burden of full CSRD compliance.
A practical rule of thumb in 2026:
VSME is positioned as the EU’s preferred voluntary on-ramp, which may make it easier to respond to EU buyer and lender requests. If you operate globally or already use GRI, many companies choose a mapping approach (GRI for broad stakeholder reporting, combined with VSME- or ESRS-aligned disclosures for EU customer, lender, and procurement requests).
Yes, reporting under VSME is significantly more cost-effective compared to mandatory CSRD reporting. One of the biggest savings comes from the exemption from the CSRD audit, which can cost between €50,000 and €150,000. Additionally, VSME requires less extensive data collection and reporting complexity, reducing the time commitment for internal teams and minimizing the need for external consulting services.
Yes. Large companies will still need supplier data for risk management and reporting, but the expectation is that asks to SMEs should be more targeted and aligned to simplified approaches.
Mandatory CSRD reporting is typically assessed at group level. If a company is required to prepare consolidated financial statements and the group meets the CSRD thresholds, the group must publish a consolidated CSRD report, which can cover its subsidiaries.
Companies in CSRD scope will be limited in what they can request from value-chain partners with up to 1,000 employees: those partners can refuse information requests that go beyond a voluntary standard expected to be based on VSME.
EU Taxonomy: The Omnibus package limits mandatory EU Taxonomy reporting to the largest companies (at least 1,000 employees and €450m net turnover) while allowing others to report voluntarily.
CSDDD: Mandatory CSDDD obligations are expected to apply only to very large companies, generally those with more than 5,000 employees and a net turnover exceeding €1.5 billion.
In most cases, yes. If you fall outside the narrowed CSRD scope, you are also unlikely to be in scope for mandatory EU Taxonomy reporting, and even less likely to be captured by CSDDD, which targets a smaller population of very large companies.
Some Omnibus changes are already in force. In particular, the “stop-the-clock” delay has been formally adopted, pushing back the first CSRD reporting date for Wave 2 companies to 2028 (covering FY2027).
The remaining Omnibus changes, including the narrowed CSRD scope and the Amended ESRS, have been politically agreed at EU level and are expected to enter into force following final legal adoption, publication, and national implementation.
A full reversal is extremely unlikely. The reporting delay is already law, and there is broad alignment between the European Commission, Parliament, and Council on narrowing scope and simplifying requirements.
Companies should adjust preparation, not pause it:
Coolset's VSME product is now ready. Please schedule a time with our team to discuss it.
Find out what the Omnibus outcome means for CSRD and CSDDD scope and timing

Collect ESG data, collaborate and create structured, automated reports with Coolset.
